01
Start with the brief
The funder defines a frozen framework: eligibility gates, weighted criteria, and the evidence expected from every applicant.
Assurance PlatformCharity · comparative assurance
A decision you can defend
From three applications to one trusted grant decision.
See how a funder can keep eligibility, evidence, scoring, moderation, and the final award connected in one review-ready record.
02
Compare like for like
Each application is assessed against the same criteria. Evidence quality stays visible beside the score, so a high number never hides a weak basis.
03
Make review accountable
Panel moderation is recorded as a change in the decision record, with the authority, rationale, and prior position kept intact.
04
Publish the decision
The final outcome is a durable, reviewable record: who was selected, why, and how the panel reached that conclusion.
Presenter pack
Start with the bidder PDFs.
Open these fictional application packs beside the workflow, then use them to demonstrate how EPR turns source documents into a governed, like-for-like selection decision.
The proof point
Three applicants. One frozen basis. A traceable outcome.